|
|
Asset Swap
Definition:
The purchase of a fixed rate instrument, plus a position of paying fixed and receiving floating in an interest rate swap of the same maturity.
A dealer ordinarily arranges both the sale and the swap.
Example: An investor who wants to buy Freddie Mac debt with a floating coupon might buy Freddie Mac's fixed rate debt and pay fixed in an interest rate swap.
Application: The main reason for doing an asset swap is to tailor a bond's coupon stream to fit one's needs,
namely to convert a fixed coupon stream into a floating stream.
Pricing: The asset swap should trade at roughly the cost of the underlying fixed rate instrument,
because the interest rate swap should have zero value at inception.
Risk Management: The asset swap is a tool for converting from the risk of price fluctuations to the risk of payment fluctuations,
since the value of default riskless floating rate debt reverts to par at each reset debt.
Comment: Asset swap spreads are useful for pricing credit default swaps.
BISTRO
Definition:
An acronym for either of the following, depending on who's talking and who might be listening.
1. Broad Index Secured Trust Offering. J.P.Morgan's preferred vehicle for transferring a significant amount of diverse credit risk to an SPV.
2. BIS Total Rip Off. An alternative definition of unknown meaning.
Bond Guarantee
Definition:
A contract that puts
the guarantor in place of the debtor, in case of debtor's default.
Thus,
a guarantee seems to promise payment in full of the bond's interest and
principal and is like bond insurance (q.v.) that pays off
enough to make the borrower whole.
Of course, we have to ask, "Who
guarantees the guarantor?"
Bond Insurance
Definition:
An insurance contract that promises the bondholder a payment (maybe not payment in full) in case the debtor defaults.
Chase Secured Loan Trust Note (CLST)
Definition:Chase Bank's preferred vehicle for transferring a large amount of diverse credit risk into an SPV.
Collateralized Bond Obligation (CBO)
Definition: A note or bond or tranches of notes and/or bonds that an SPV (q.v.)
issues, in order to raise money to buy bonds that serve as collateral
for the SPV obligations.
Application: The CBO gets the bonds off the balance sheet of the SPV's creator, in return for cash,
and allows the creator to structure collateral and SPV obligations to
provide the desired credit rating.
Collateralized Loan Obligation (CLO)
Definition:A note or bond or tranches of notes and/or bonds that an SPV (q.v.) issues,
in order to raise money to buy loans that serve as collateral for the SPV obligations.
Application: The CLO gets the loans and attendant exposure off the balance sheet of the SPV's creator,
in return for cash, and allows the creator to structure collateral and SPV obligations to provide the desired credit rating.
Synthetic Collateralized Loan Obligation (CLO)
Definition:A note or bond or tranches of notes and/or bonds that a lender issues,
plus related credit swaps, designed to reduce the lender's credit exposure and raise money, so it can make additional loans.
One or more credit swaps provide(s) credit protection for the loans, enhancing their cash flow as collateral.
The notes may include credit-linked notes, where the note-holders assume some of the credit risk of the underlying loans.
The lender ordinarily assumes as much as a few percent of the first credit loss.
Collateralized Mortgage Obligation (CMO)
Definition:A note or bond or tranches of notes and/or bonds that an SPV (q.v.) issues,
in order to raise money to buy mortgage loans that serve as collateral for the note(s).
Application: The CMO gets the bonds off the balance sheet of the CMO's creator,
thus eliminating credit exposure, in return for cash, and allows the creator to structure collateral and
notes to provide the desired credit rating.
Comment: The REMIC (q.v.) has replaced the CMO as the vehicle of choice for repackaging mortgage loans and
getting them off a mortgage lender's balance sheet.
REMIC
Definition:(q.v.).
Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit
A structure with favorable tax treatment that the U.S. Congress created in 1986 for issuing CMOs (q.v.).
Commercial Credit Insurance
Definition:
Insurance that makes a business whole when its debtors default, such as when they fail to pay for goods and services they buy.
Particularly for smaller businesses, a credit insurance policy often includes guidance on credit policy, to reduce losses.
Application: A prime application is to make it easier for a business to raise financing,
by reducing the uncertainty about its receipts.
Risk Management: Issuers of credit insurance ordinarily rely on diversification for risk management.
Credit Default Swap (CDS)
Definition:
A derivative contract between a buyer and a seller of protection,
in which (a) the buyer of protection pays the seller a fixed, regular fee
and (b) the seller of protection provides the buyer with a contingent exchange that occurs
either at the maturity of the underlying instrument (note or bond)
or at the swap's date of early termination.
The trigger event for the contingent payoff is a defined credit event,
which might be a default on the underlying instrument or other, related event.
The contingent exchange consists of the seller of protection paying the buyer the principal amount of the
underlying instrument (says, 100), in exchange for the instrument (with
value that we denote by B).
Cash settlement in the amount of
100 - B ³ from the seller of protection to the buyer is an
alternative to physical settlement.
Example: A German bank has a risky corporate loan on its books.
The bank pays a counterparty 1% of principal per year for a "put option" that has as its trigger the
corporation's bankruptcy or insolvency.
Application: The buyer of protection may want to manage its risk or satisfy a regulator and reduce regulatory capital.
Pricing: Buying protection in a credit default swap is equivalent to shorting the credit risky
underlying instrument and reinvesting the proceeds in a credit riskless
instrument with the same sort of coupon (fixed or floating) and
maturity.
Hence, the credit default swap should have the same value.
Risk Management: The CDS is a static hedging instrument.
Comment: Under specific circumstances, the CDS is equivalent to a TRR swap.
Credit Event
Definition:
A bankruptcy, default, failure to make payments, insolvency, restructuring of debt that hurts a class of creditors.
Default Correlation
Definition:
A statistical relationship between the values for two obligations of the binary random variable
representing the obligation's default status (i.e., default / no default).
Example: We would anticipate a high default correlation between the debt of one Korean bank and the debt of its
biggest borrower,
because if the borrower defaults it will stop making payments to the bank, which may have to default on its own debt.
Default Point
Definition:
The asset value at which at which a firm will default. Net worth may be zero at this point.
Application: Default point is a key parameter in the KMV methodology.
Default Probability
The probability that a counterparty or debtor will fail to meet his obligations.
Distance-to-Default (DD)
Definition:The number of standard deviations that asset value is from default point (q.v.).
DD = (Asset Value - Default Point) / (Asset Value x Asset Volatility).
Expected Default FrequencyTM(EDFTM)
KMV Corp.'s proprietary measure of the probability
that a firm will default during a subsequent.
Currently, KMV computes EDFTM for the subsequent 1-5 years as a function of the
firm's DD (q.v.), based on historical results for firms with a comparable DD.
Exposure
The potential credit loss due to the face value of a loan to a debtor or the market value of a contract with a counterparty.
GKOs
Russian government Treasury bills.
IANs
Interest in Arrears Notes,
a tradable, current form of unpaid interest on bank loans that the former Soviet Union took out.
Russia made two payments on these before the 1998 crisis. In 10/99 IANs traded at about 11 percent of par. Cf. Prins.
(Craig Mellow, "Squeezing out the last ruble, Institutional Investor, 11/99, p. 77 ff.)
Letter of Credit (LC)
- The Circular Letter of Credit is a lot like a traveller's check that you can use only to get cash at a specific bank.
You give your bank X yen (say) and it issues an LC for X yen.
If you deliver the letter to a specified foreign bank,
it gives you X yen or the equivalent in foreign currency (minus something for its trouble).
The circular LC replaces the danger that a stranger will take your money
at gunpoint with the danger that a bank will simply keep your money when
you ask for it.
- In international trade Importer "opens" an LC with Importer's Bank.
This means that Importer arranges with Importer's Bank (the "issuing bank") to issue an LC that is negotiable at Exporter's Bank (the "negotiating bank").
The terms of the LC say that Exporter's Bank will deliver X yen (say) to the Exporter if Exporter
presents the LC and satisfies its conditions.
The conditions are things like presenting trade documents indicating that Exporter has delivered
the goods at the right time and place, and in the right quality and quantity.
revocable (An irrevocable)LC is one that either (neither) the issuing bank or (nor) Importer can revoke.
The negotiating bank will honour a confirmed LC, even if the issuing bank fails to pay.
The negotiating bank will honor an unconfirmed LC only if the issuing bank pays.
Thus, the confirmed Letter of Credit has a significant component of credit risk to it. The negotiating bank takes the issuing bank's credit.
This eliminates the need for Exporter to take Importer's credit.
Basic business sense indicates that the negotiating bank gets some money for taking that risk, and that the greater the risk, the greater the money.
LINS
Loan Identification Number System.
The trademark for a system that establishes a unique number for each loan.
Each loan is to its LIN as each security (e.g., share or bond) is to its CUSIP number.
Loss, Given Default
The magnitude of the loss due to a counterparty or creditor's default.
The term seems redundant, because "loss, given no default" would be zero, under a reasonable definition.
Materiality Clause
In a contract, a clause that stipulates when an event or action is significant.
In a credit derivatives contract, the materiality clause specifies when a credit event is significant.
Typically, if a credit event occurs along with a drop in the price of the reference instrument, then the event is material.
Migration Risk
The risk of loss due to a change in an obligation's credit rating.
[Not to be confused with the possibility that the
entire population of Mexico will decide to migrate to the more
attractive economic and political environment in California, Arizona,
New Mexico, and Texas.]
Portfolio [credit] Risk
The magnitude of the potential loss due to default by any or all counterparties and/or creditors,
as opposed to the potential loss due to default by a single counterparty or creditor on a single obligation.
Cf. standalone risk.
Prins
Principal notes, tradable, bondlike current form of bank loans that the former Soviet Union took out.
Russia made two payments on these before the 1998 crisis.
In 10/99 Prins traded at about 9 percent of par.
Cf. IANs. (Craig Mellow, "Squeezing out the last ruble, Institutional Investor, 11/99, p. 77 ff.)
Reference Entity
The person, corporation, government, etc. whose credit quality is the credit derivatives underlying risk factor.
Reference Obligation
The note, bond, or other obligation that the reference entity issues, insures, or guarantees.
Standalone Risk
The risk of loss on a single loan or other contract, ignoring portfolio effects. Cf. portfolio [credit] risk.
Total Rate of Return (TRR) Swap (TRORS)
Definition:A derivative contract that simulates the purchase of an instrument (note, bond, share, etc.)
with 100% financing, typically floating rate.
The contract may be marked to market at each reset date, with the total return receiver receiving
(paying) any increase in value of the underlying instrument, and the
total return payer receiving (paying) any decrease in the value of the
underlying instrument.
Cash settlement is the norm for the total return swap.
Example: A U.S. regional bank that wants to invest in Patagonian debt quickly can be the TRR receiver in swap with
Patagonian debt as the underlying instrument.
Application:
A couple of prime motivations for being TRR receivers are (a) arranging
100% financing and (b) surmounting hurdles to ownership of the
underlying instrument.
Pricing: Price the TRR swap roughly the same as the replicating portfolio of (a) long position in the underlying
credit risky instrument and (b) short position in the financing instrument.
Risk Management: The TRR swap is a static hedging instrument.
Comment: Under specific circumstances, the TRR swap is equivalent to a CDS.
Vulnerable Option
- "An option on a defaultable instrument,
subject also to their issuer's default risk. Ex: A put issued by a shaky
bank on a corporate bond issued by a third party."
(Giovanni Barone-Adesi, 9/10/98.)
- An option "subject to the additional risk that the writer of the [option] might
default."
(Robert J. Jarrow and Stuart Turnbull, Derivative
Securities, Cincinnati, South-Western, 1996, p. 575.)
- An option that may not pay off as the contract specifies, because of a
possible default by one of the counterparties.
Example: You buy an OTC, deep OTM S&P 500 index put option from a hedge fund. The
market tanks and stays there until expiration. You try to collect your
winnings, and the hedge fund folds.
Pricing: The usual pricing
model for an equity index option has a single risk factor. When the
counterparty might default, the option's value depends on at least
another risk factor, the counterparty's equity.
Risk Management: The derivatives market ordinarily handles vulnerable
derivatives in any of three ways: (1) the "ostrich approach", pretending
that the counterparties can't default, (2) the "creditor enhancement
approach", putting the deal on the books of AAA subsidiaries, and (3)
the "secured lending approach", putting up collateral to secure each
counterparty's position.
Comment: I prefer the term, "credit risky derivative", which seems more transparent.
OFZs
Russian government Treasury bonds.
OVZs
Long term, hard currency bonds that the Russian Ministry of Finance issued. Known as "Taiga" bonds or "MinFins".
Essays
Pricing Credit Default Swaps (5/28/00)
The most commonly used and reliable models for pricing credit derivatives price are for pricing a
credit default swap (CDS) for an underlying, credit-risky floating-rate
note (FRN).
The CDS payoff is B(T) - PFRN(T) = 100 - PFRN(T) ,
where B(T) is the value of a default-free FRN and PFRN(T) is the value of the underlying, risky FRN.
B(T) = 100% of par, because the model assumes that the default-free FRN resets to par at each reset date.
Its premium is some constant, periodic rate.
The pricing model for this CDS assumes that the CDS value is the cost of a replicating portfolio.
Two replicating portfolios have potential for use in the pricing model, and we discuss both.
As good as these models are, they are not perfect, because they do not handle some relevant details.
Science leaves room for skill and guts.
We develop two similar models for pricing a CDS for an underlying, credit-risky fixed-rate note (FxRN)
off the price of a replicating portfolio.
The wrinkle here is that the payoff function is not 100 - PFxRN(T) ,
but B(T) - PFxRN(T) ,
where B is the market value of a default-free note that is "comparable" to the FxRN - same coupon, same maturity.
This isolates the credit risk of the FxRN from its market risk.
Note: If the default occurs before maturity, and interest rates have moved significantly, then the value of the default-free note might deviate
significantly from 100.
Assumptions
Credit Default Swap (CDS)
The CDS pays off at default the dollar loss on the underlying note:
Payoff = 100 - PFRN(t)
or
Payoff = 100 - PFxRN(t).
The cost of that payment is a periodic rate, similar to a bond or note coupon:
Premium = CCDS
Other Assumptions
- All the FRNs in this discussion have a par value of 100 and pay coupons that are LIBOR plus a spread, L + SFRN.
The default-free FRNs have a market value of 100 at each reset date.
- All the FxRNs in this discussion have a par value of 100 and pay fixed coupons, CFxRN.
- The interest rate swaps have notional mount of 100. They’re all on-the-run, hence have initially a market value of zero.
- The "AAAA" rating is not something you will see in literature from Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s.
However, the market recognizes that some names are better than others, and some are much better than the rest of the best.
These are the "AAAA" names that have credit quality similar to Treasuries.
Analysis
Figure 1 defines the cash flows associated with some relevant positions in the underlying, credit-risky debt and other instruments and portfolios.
The "Position" column names the position.
For now, let’s consider only the first five simple positions, not the replicating portfolio positions in rows (6) to (9):
- receive fixed in an interest rate swap (IRS)
- buy a U.S. Treasury note
- buy a "AAAA" FRN
- buy a risky FRN
- buy a risky FxRN
The "Initial CF" column denotes the initial outlay for getting into the position in the previous column.
For the swap, Initial CF = 0, because the swap is on-the-run.
The other initial cash flows are negative in the amount of the instrument’s initial cost.
The "Periodic CF" is a fixed or floating coupon, except for the IRS, there, it is an exchange of floating coupon for fixed.
The "Terminal CF" for the IRS includes a term for its MTM value, because we need to allow for the
"terminal" date to precede the maturity of the underlying note, if default
occurs. The terminal prices of the IRS and UST are not 100, because of
market risk for early default of the underlying credit-risky note. The
"AAAA" FRN’s value is 100 at any reset date. Of course, this is an
oversimplification, because either its credit quality might change or
default might not occur at a reset date. The risky FRN’s terminal value is
not 100 because of default risk. The risky FxRN’s terminal value is not
100 because of default and market risk.
Line |
Position |
Initial CF |
Periodic CF |
Terminal CF |
(1) |
Rec. Fxd., IRS |
0 |
CIRS - L |
PIRS(T) + CIRS - L |
(2) |
Buy UST |
-PUST(0) |
CUST |
PUST(T) + CUST |
(3 |
Buy "AAAA" FRN |
-PAAAA(0) |
L + SAAAA |
100 + L + SAAAA |
(4) |
Buy Risky FRN |
-PFRN(0) |
L + SFRN |
PFRN(T) + L + SFRN |
(5) |
Buy Risky FxRN |
-FxRN(0) |
CFxRN |
PFxRN(T) + CFxRN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDS on FRN |
|
|
|
(6) |
(3) - (4) - Model 1 |
PFRN(0) - PAAAA(0) |
SAAAA - SFRN |
100 - PFRN(T) + SAAAA - SFRN |
(7) |
(2) - (4) + (1) - Model 2 |
PFRN(0) - PUST(0) |
CUST - SFRN - C |
PUST(T) - PFRN(T) - PIRS(T) + CUST - SFRN - CIRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDS on FxRN |
|
|
|
(8) |
(2) - (4) - Model 3 |
PFxRN(0) - PUST(0) |
CT - CFxRN |
PUST(T) - PFxRN(T) + CT - CFxRN |
(9) |
(3) - (4) + (1) - Model 4 |
PFxRN(0) - PAAAA(0) |
SAAAA - CFxRN + CIRS |
PAAAA(T) - PFxRN(T) + PIRS(T) + SAAAA - CFxRN + CIRS |
Underlying Credit-risky FRN
This is more of a pure credit play. Any problem with interest-rate market risk is minimal, because the
underlying, credit-risky note is an FRN.
Model 1
Replicating Portfolio
- Buy a "AAAA"-rated FRN and short the credit-risky FRN with the same maturity.
- The "recovery" payoff at the common maturity equals the excess of
the terminal value of the "AAAA" note over that of the credit-risky FRN.
Presumably, the "AAAA" note will be at par.
- The up-front cost is the excess of the AAAA note cost over the cost of the FRN.
- The periodic cost of the protection is the excess of the
credit-risky FRN’s spread over LIBOR over the AAAA FRN’s spread over
LIBOR.
Caveat
- The AAAA note is not completely default-free. Thus, the "arbitrage" is not perfect.
Model 2
Replicating Portfolio
- Buy a US Treasury note that matures when the underlying, credit-risky FRN matures.
- Pay fixed on an IRS to create a synthetic AAAA FRN.
- Short the underlying, credit-risky FRN.
- The up-front cost is the excess of the Treasury note cost over the cost of the FRN.
- The periodic cost of the protection is the excess of the coupon on the IRS over the excess of the Treasury coupon
over the spead over LIBOR of the credit-risky FRN.
Caveats
- The IRS has a positive probability of default.
- The swap spread may change, creating basis risk.
- This assumes that the difference in coupons is due to probability of default.
In fact, it may by due at least partially to differences in taxation
- Buy a Treasury that matures at the underlying note’s maturity.
- Short the underlying, credit-risky note.
- The promised cash flow at maturity is the dollar loss on the underlying note.
- The up-front cost equals the excess of the Treasury note cost over the FxRN cost.
- The periodic cash flow through maturity is the excess of the credit-risky fixed coupon over the Treasury coupon.
Caveat
- This assumes that the only possible default is at the underlying
note’s maturity. If default comes earlier, then the Treasury may not
trade for par, and the "replicating portfolio" may not replicate the
CDS, creating a "basis risk".
- This assumes that the difference in coupon is due to probability
of default. In fact, it may by due at least partially to differences in
taxation or liquidity.
Model 4
Replicating Portfolio
- Buy a "AAAA" corporate FRN that matures at the underlying note’s maturity.
- Swap the floating coupon to fixed by receiving fixed in a vanilla IRS.
- Short the underlying, credit-risky FxRN
- The promised cash flow at maturity is the dollar loss on the underlying note.
- The up-front cost is the excess of the AAAA note cost over the cost of the FxRN.
- The periodic cost through maturity is the excess of the credit-risky coupon
over the sum of the par swap coupon and the "AAAA" spread over LIBOR.
Caveat
- The swap spread may change, creating basis risk.
- If default occurs before maturity, then the Treasury may not
trade at par, and the "replicating portfolio" may not replicate the CDS,
creating a "basis risk".
- This assumes that the FRN price reverts to par at each coupon
reset date. The contractual spread over or under LIBOR may not always be
current, and the FRN price may drift away from par. Thus, we’ll have a
small version of the main problem with Model 1.